Wowzers! Consular Fees for Processing U.S. Citizenship Renunciations Decreased to US$450 Fee – ($320 – inflation adjusted)!
More than a dozen years ago, I wrote a blog when the State Department jacked up the fee to US$ 2,350.
As of September 2026, the U.S. Department of State has reduced the U.S. citizenship renunciation fee from $2,350 to $450. Adjusted for inflation since the 2014 increase, $450 today is equivalent to approximately $320 in 2014 dollars — the lowest real-terms cost for renunciation in more than a decade.
This is what the updated government website provides regarding renunciation:
Overview
Relinquishment of U.S. citizenship by performing certain statutory expatriating acts, including taking the oath of renunciation, voluntarily and with the intent of relinquishing U.S. citizenship, is a personal right that cannot be exercised on a person’s behalf. For example, a person’s parent(s) or legal guardian may not take the oath of renunciation for that person. A Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN) approved by the Department of State is the final agency determination of loss of U.S. nationality.
NOTE: STEPS 1-4 below outline the process for requesting a CLN based on taking an oath of renunciation before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer abroad under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 349(a)(5), 8 USC 1481(a)(5). For information on the parallel process to request a Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN) on the basis of the commission of another potentially expatriating act under INA 349(a)(1)-(4), 8 USC 1481(a)(1)-(4), please contact your location by selecting it below.
Oath of Renunciation of U.S. Nationality
Embassy, consulate, or office providing consular services process requests to take the oath of renunciation of U.S. citizenship. Minors, individuals who do not read or write English, individuals with mental health or cognitive disability or impairment and/or guardianship, and those for whom loss of U.S. nationality would result in statelessness are invited to contact your location to discuss taking the oath of renunciation.
Taking an oath to renounce U.S. nationality before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer overseas is a serious and irrevocable act. Therefore, you should carefully consider and fully understand the consequences and ramifications of this act prior to your decision to begin the process.
Steps to Take
STEP 1: Review the legal requirements and consequences/ramifications of taking the oath of renunciation of U.S. citizenship.
Please read the information provided by the embassy, consulate, or office providing consular services and available online at the Department of State and Internal Revenue Service links below regarding the legal requirements for taking the oath of renunciation before beginning this process. Loss of U.S. nationality is irrevocable, and you should fully understand the consequences and ramifications before beginning this process.
For questions related to possible U.S. tax implications, please contact the Internal Revenue Service and/or review the Joint Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) FAQ .
For questions related to Social Security Administration (SSA) or other federal benefits, please contact your location.
Department of State and Internal Revenue Service links:
STEP 2: Email your location to initiate the process and receive instructions. Gather and submit scanned copies of the required documents and schedule your first interview.
To schedule an initial interview, which will be conducted by telephone or in-person at the embassy, consulate, or office providing consular services, please send an email to your location. Canada, Bern, Berlin, Amsterdam, Australia (Sydney and Melbourne), Singapore, Brussels, and Paris provide electronic first interviews
Applicants should personally review all documents and prepare all forms provided by the embassy, consulate, or office providing consular services in accordance with the instructions. DO NOT SIGN ANY FORMS BEFORE YOUR FINAL INTERVIEW.
STEP 3: Schedule and attend the final interview at the embassy, consulate, or office providing consular services with all required original documents and pay the fee.
Schedule your final interview appointment according to embassy, consulate, or office providing consular services instructions. On the day of your final interview appointment, you must bring all of the original documents you previously submitted by email. You will be asked to reschedule if you do not have the required documents at the time of your final interview appointment.
Your Consular Report of Birth Abroad, and Certificate of Naturalization or Citizenship, if applicable, generally will be retained by the embassy, consulate, or office providing consular services during the remainder of the process and then returned to you. Your U.S. passport also will be retained and, if your Certificate of Loss of Nationality is approved by the Department of State, it will be canceled before it is returned to you upon your request. If you need to travel to the United States on your U.S. passport after the second interview but before the Certificate of Loss of Nationality has been approved, please so advise the embassy, consulate, or office providing consular services at the second interview.
You will meet with a consular officer for your second interview and you will be given another opportunity to review the documents that you have already filled out (but not signed) Form DS-4079, Questionnaire; Loss of United States Nationality; Attestations prior to signing them and taking the oath of renunciation.
Fee: Immediately after taking the oath of renunciation, you must pay the non-refundable current fee of US $450 for administrative processing of a request for a Certificate of Loss of Nationality. The fee is not waivable, nor is it refundable if your request for a Certificate of Loss of Nationality is denied.
Step 4: Receive the Certificate of Loss of Nationality if approved by the Department of State
The Department of State will review each request for a Certificate of Loss of Nationality to determine whether there is a legal basis to approve it. This step may take several months or more. The embassy, consulate, or office providing consular services may contact you for further information before the Department of State decides your case. The embassy,
consulate, or office providing consular services will email you if and when your request has been approved. If your request is denied, the embassy, consulate, or office providing consular services will send you an email attaching a denial letter.
NOTE: STEPS 1-4 above outline the process for requesting a CLN based on taking an oath of renunciation before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer abroad under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 349(a)(5), 8 USC 1481(a)(5). For information on the parallel process to request a Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN) on the basis of the commission of another potentially expatriating act under INA 349(a)(1)-(4), 8 USC 1481(a)(1)-(4), please contact your location for inquiries.
Fees (Prices in U.S. Dollars)
Non-refundable fee of $450 USD at the time of the appointment.
What the Fee Reduction Does Not Change
The $450 consular fee covers only the State Department’s administrative processing of the renunciation appointment. It has no effect on the U.S. tax consequences of renunciation, which are governed entirely by separate federal tax law.
A U.S. citizen who renounces citizenship in 2026 still faces the same IRS obligations as before the fee change. Form 8854, the Initial and Annual Expatriation Information Statement, must still be filed. The five-year tax compliance certification is still required. If the renouncing individual qualifies as a covered expatriate under the three IRS tests — net worth, average annual tax liability, and compliance certification — the Section 877A mark-to-market exit tax still applies in full.
The fee reduction makes the administrative step of renouncing less expensive. It does not reduce the tax cost.
Is the $450 Fee the Only Cost of Renouncing?
No. The consular fee is the smallest cost most people encounter. The substantive costs of renunciation depend entirely on the individual’s financial situation and filing history. For individuals who are covered expatriates, the Section 877A exit tax can represent a significant liability. For individuals with unfiled FBARs or unreported foreign accounts, FBAR penalties may apply separately.
Attorney fees for proper pre-renunciation planning, tax preparation for Form 8854, and any exit tax liability are the costs that vary significantly from person to person. The $450 appointment fee is the one cost that is the same for everyone.
When Did the Fee Change Take Effect?
The State Department updated its fee schedule in September 2026, reducing the U.S. citizenship renunciation fee from $2,350 to $450 effective immediately. The $2,350 fee had been in place since September 2014, when it was increased by more than 500 percent from the prior $450 level. In real terms, adjusted for inflation since 2014, the current $450 fee is equivalent to approximately $320 in 2014 dollars.
What Is the IRS Non-Filer Program and How Does It Affect Americans Abroad?
U.S. Citizens and Green-Card Holders Abroad: The IRS Non-Filer Program Explained
On this page:
Read the full analysis here.
What is U.S. citizenship-based taxation, and who does it reach?
The U.S. taxes based on citizenship, not just on where a person lives. A U.S. citizen who has spent nearly all of their life outside the U.S. can still fall within the U.S. tax system. Lawful permanent residents (green-card holders, also called LPRs) residing outside the U.S. can be reached as well. Many people in both groups are shocked to learn how broad this scope is.
Why does the IRS focus so heavily on accounts and assets outside the U.S.?
In recent years the IRS and the Tax Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) have aggressively pursued assets and accounts located outside the U.S. That pursuit has put a keen focus on the offshore holdings of U.S. citizens and green-card holders who live abroad.
What are the “New Filing Compliance Procedures for Non-Resident U.S. Taxpayers”?
In August the IRS articulated its position for U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents residing outside the U.S. in a document titled “New Filing Compliance Procedures for Non-Resident U.S. Taxpayers.” It sets out how the IRS approaches the filing obligations of those taxpayers.
What is the IRS non-filer program?
The IRS has had, for years, a specific program aimed at “non-filers,” meaning persons who do not file U.S. income tax returns. The program is detailed in the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM), the IRS’s internal handbook of procedures. It can apply to U.S. citizens and green-card holders living overseas who have not filed.
What can happen if a U.S. citizen or green-card holder living abroad never files a U.S. return?
When a taxpayer does not file, the IRS may prepare a “substitute return” on that person’s behalf. A substitute return is a return the IRS files for the taxpayer, rather than one the taxpayer files. This can apply to U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents residing overseas who are non-filers. Anyone facing this situation may want to consult an experienced attorney.
Where is the non-filer program actually written down?
The non-filer program is laid out in the Internal Revenue Manual at section 4.19.17, the Non-Filer Program. Its subsections cover the full process:
- 4.19.17.1 — Non-Filer Program
- 4.19.17.2 — Non-Filer Strategy
- 4.19.17.3 — Non-Filer Processing
- 4.19.17.4 — Non-Filer Penalties
- 4.19.17.5 — Undelivered Mail
- 4.19.17.6 — Taxpayer Replies
- 4.19.17.7 — Closures, Non-Examined
Read the full analysis here.
Why Are Foreign Banks Closing Accounts for Americans Abroad?
Is it hype, or is it real? Many U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (green-card holders) living overseas have heard that foreign banks are closing their accounts. Here is what actually shows up in practice, and why so many people are moving their money home.
On this page
Read the full analysis here.
Are foreign banks really closing the accounts of Americans living overseas?
It is hard to know with certainty how accurate these claims are. If it has happened to you, of course you will know it. In practice, account closings have turned up in places such as Hong Kong, London, Geneva, and Zurich. But they do not appear to be a widespread practice, at least not anecdotally.
What have news reports said about banks cutting off American expats?
Several published reports have raised the issue, including:
- The Wall Street Journal, “Expats Left Frustrated as Banks Cut Services Abroad” (11 Sept 2014).
- The Wall Street Journal opinion piece by Colleen Graffy, “How to Lose Friends, Citizens and Influence.”
- Time Magazine, “Swiss Banks Tell American Expats to Empty Their Accounts.”
- The Huffington Post (Aug 2014), “Expatriate Tax Sense or Broad-Brush Overreach: The U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).”
- The New York Times (April 2013), “Overseas Finances Can Trip Up Americans Abroad.”
- The Association of Americans Resident Overseas, on Americans abroad being denied access to banking and investment opportunities.
- American Citizens Abroad, which compiles various news accounts of accounts being closed.
Does the size of the account change how a foreign bank responds?
It appears to. For individuals with large investment accounts, for example greater than US$1 million, banks seem to accommodate them, or at least require them to move their assets to a U.S. affiliate or branch. Those with smaller accounts, for example less than US$100,000, appear to see a broader brush stroke of closures.
If foreign banks aren’t the main driver, who is closing these accounts?
Much of it is the individual’s own decision, not the bank’s. What has been widespread in practice is a plan by individuals to close foreign financial accounts and relocate the assets to a U.S. financial institution. This includes U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (green-card holders) living outside the U.S. The move is the individual’s choice, not the financial institution’s.
Why are U.S. citizens and green-card holders abroad choosing to close their foreign accounts?
The reason is generally not FATCA (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) itself, but a desire to reduce the compliance costs of filing and reporting on foreign accounts. FATCA seeks to co-opt foreign banks as long-arm enforcement of U.S. tax law. Even so, the driver people cite is cost, not the statute. Multiple tiers of reporting of foreign assets is now required. It can cost a small fortune to retain a good international tax adviser who is aware of these reporting requirements.
What reporting makes holding foreign accounts so expensive?
Two main layers apply to U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents living outside the U.S.: the FBAR (the Foreign Bank Account Report) and IRS Form 8938 (Specified Foreign Financial Assets). For those with significant assets and numerous accounts, the professional fees and costs of reporting these accounts accurately can become exorbitant. That is especially true when the risk of potentially devastating civil penalties is weighed into the mix.
What penalties are people worried about?
The IRS now regularly threatens large, multiple-year 50% willfulness penalties for those who did not file an FBAR. This risk is more than just perceived. The Zwerner FBAR case is one example, and it has been described as probably a Pyrrhic victory for the government for U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents living outside the U.S. The combination of cost, compliance burden, and penalty risk is what drives many people to act.
Is it actually illegal for a U.S. person to hold a foreign bank account?
No. There is no legal restriction for a U.S. citizen to hold foreign accounts. A U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident residing outside the U.S. will generally find it easier, from a lifestyle and personal financial management perspective, to have an account in their home country. The irony is that the practical effect pushes in the opposite direction.
Where are these assets ending up?
The practical effect, anecdotally, is that U.S. financial institutions are receiving these assets and investments. As individuals close foreign accounts to cut compliance costs and penalty risk, the money flows back into the U.S. rather than staying in their home country abroad.
Read the full analysis here.
What Is a Certificate of Loss of Nationality and Why Does Your Bank Need It?
Who Is a “U.S. Person” for Tax, and How FATCA Treats Former Citizens and Green-Card Holders
Table of contents
Read the full analysis here.
How does your immigration status decide whether you owe U.S. tax?
Your U.S. tax status starts with your immigration status. The U.S. taxes a “U.S. person” (the technical term used for U.S. federal tax purposes) on worldwide income, and whether you are a “U.S. person” depends largely on immigration concepts. Three immigration-based categories can make someone a U.S. person:
- U.S. citizenship;
- lawful permanent residency (a green card); and
- meeting the substantial presence test as a non-citizen.
A person in any of these categories may have U.S. income tax residency, and so may be subject to U.S. income tax on income earned anywhere in the world.
Who counts as a U.S. citizen for tax purposes?
Almost every individual born in the United States is a U.S. citizen under the 14th Amendment. Citizenship can also pass from a parent. A child born outside the U.S. to a U.S. citizen parent may also be a U.S. citizen at birth through “derivative citizenship,” meaning citizenship derived from a U.S. citizen parent. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) publishes “Nationality Chart 1, for Children Born Outside U.S.” to help determine whether such a child was a U.S. citizen at birth. Because U.S. citizens are “U.S. persons,” they are generally subject to U.S. tax on their worldwide income.
Can a green-card holder or visa holder be a “U.S. person” too?
Yes. Two non-citizen categories can still make someone a “U.S. person” for tax. The first is a lawful permanent resident (LPR), a green-card holder; LPR status carries a series of complex rules that can affect “U.S. person” status. The second is a person who is neither a citizen nor an LPR but who meets the “substantial presence test,” a tax test based on the number of days an individual is physically present in the United States. A person in either category may be treated as a “U.S. person” and taxed on worldwide income.
What is FATCA, and why is your foreign bank asking if you are a U.S. person?
If your foreign bank has asked whether you are a U.S. person, FATCA is why. FATCA (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, Chapter 4 of Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code) entered into force in January 2014. It imposes obligations on financial institutions (“FFI”) and basically all private companies and legal entities (“NFFE”) throughout the world to confirm whether they have any “U.S. person” account holders or owners. That worldwide duty to check is what leads banks and companies outside the U.S. to ask account holders about their U.S. status.
How does a former U.S. citizen prove they are no longer a “U.S. person”?
A former U.S. citizen must generally provide a Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN), Form DS-4083, to prove they are no longer a U.S. person. This is a specific requirement both under the FATCA regulations and under a provision adopted into the FATCA intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) signed between the U.S. and other countries. For example, Annex I of the IGA between the U.S. and Spain addresses CLNs. Without the CLN, a financial institution may continue to treat the individual as a U.S. person.
Why does a U.S. place of birth make foreign banks ask for extra proof?
A U.S. place of birth is a warning sign to a withholding agent. Under Treasury Regulations Section 1.1441–7T, a withholding agent has reason to know that documents claiming foreign status are unreliable if its records show an unambiguous U.S. place of birth. To still treat such an account holder as a foreign person, the agent generally needs documentary evidence of citizenship in a country other than the United States (described in § 1.1471–3(c)(5)(i)(B)), plus one of the following:
- a copy of the individual’s Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN); or
- a reasonable written explanation of the renunciation of U.S. citizenship, or of why the person did not obtain U.S. citizenship at birth.
Alternatively, a valid Form W–8 establishing the account holder’s foreign status, together with that citizenship evidence and the written explanation, may satisfy the requirement.
Once you are no longer a U.S. person, does FATCA reporting stop?
Generally yes, once the right documentation is on file. A person who is no longer a “U.S. person” can generally avoid FATCA reporting to the IRS by a foreign financial institution (FFI), or by a company or legal entity (NFFE) in any country outside the U.S. The condition is that the supporting documentation, namely the Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN), is provided to that institution or entity. Until the CLN reaches the institution, FATCA reporting on the account may continue.
What is an Apostille Certificate, and why pair it with a CLN?
An Apostille Certificate is an international authentication confirming that an official document is genuine for use in another country. When providing a Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN) to a foreign financial institution or company, it is often advisable to obtain an Apostille Certificate along with the CLN. Some third-party organizations will accept the CLN only when it carries this certification. Pairing the apostille with the CLN can help the document be accepted abroad.
Future posts will cover more on the interplay of FATCA and former U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents.
Read the full analysis here.
When Does the IRS Have No Time Limit to Audit or Assess Taxes?
Table of contents
Read the full analysis here.
What is the statute of limitations on an IRS tax audit?
The statute of limitations is the time frame in which the government has to conduct an audit against a US taxpayer. Once that time frame lapses, the IRS cannot commence tax audits or assess taxes or tax penalties against a US citizen (USC) or lawful permanent resident (LPR, a green card holder) living overseas. In other words, the limitations period sets a fixed window, and after it closes the taxpayer generally has protection from new audits and assessments for that year.
In what situations is there no statute of limitations for a US citizen or green card holder abroad?
There are basically three ways a US citizen or green card holder living outside the US will have no protection of a statute of limitations against the IRS. In these scenarios the limitations period stays open, so there is no closing date on the government’s ability to audit or assess. The three basic scenarios are:
- The USC or LPR does not file a US income tax return (IRC Section 6501(c)(3)).
- There is fraud on the part of the taxpayer (IRC Sections 6501(c)(1), (c)(2)).
- The USC or LPR fails to report certain foreign transactions (IRC Section 6501(c)(8)).
What happens to the statute of limitations if you do not file a US income tax return?
If a US citizen or green card holder does not file a US income tax return, there is no statute of limitations for that year under IRC Section 6501(c)(3). Because the limitations clock generally starts when a return is filed, no return means the period never begins to run. The IRS may therefore audit or assess for that year without a fixed cutoff.
How does tax fraud affect the statute of limitations?
Where there is fraud on the part of the taxpayer, there is no statute of limitations under IRC Sections 6501(c)(1) and (c)(2). An example is a taxpayer who intentionally does not report income. In that situation the limitations period stays open, so the IRS may pursue an audit or assessment for that year without a closing date.
What happens if you fail to report certain foreign transactions?
If a US citizen or green card holder fails to report certain foreign transactions, there is no statute of limitations under IRC Section 6501(c)(8). This rule was only recently adopted as part of the “HIRE Act,” the same law that created FATCA (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act). The limitations period for the year can remain open until the required foreign-transaction reporting is made.
Why file a complete and accurate return even when no tax is owed?
One basic point from the law is that a US citizen or green card holder is almost always better off filing tax returns that are complete and accurate, even when no tax is owing. Filing this way helps assure a fixed time frame during which the US federal government can conduct tax audits and other related tax investigations. Without that fixed window, the limitations period may stay open. Anyone weighing their own situation may want to consult an experienced tax attorney.
Where can you read more about international tax statute of limitations issues?
For an overview of the statute of limitations periods, see the presentation “Starting the Race Against the Tax Authority in the International Tax World – Statute of Limitations & Lack of Filings” by John C. McDougal, Special Trial Attorney at the IRS, and Jon P. Schimmer and Eric D. Swenson of Procopio.
Read the full analysis here.
What Is a FATCA Intergovernmental Agreement and Is It Really Two-Way?
FATCA IGAs and the One-Way Reporting Gap: What US Persons and Foreign Residents Actually Face
Table of contents
Read the full analysis here.
What is FATCA, and how many countries have FATCA agreements with the United States?
FATCA (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) is the US law behind the intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) that the US Treasury negotiated with some 113 countries. Treasury publishes the full country list on its website. Not all of these countries have actually signed. Many have what Treasury calls an “agreement in substance.” The IGAs require foreign financial institutions (FFIs, meaning non-US financial institutions) to identify “U.S. Persons” and “Substantial U.S. Owners,” and to report what the IGAs call “U.S. Reportable Accounts.” Treasury describes the agreements as “bilateral.” One published example, the FATCA IGA with Colombia, is largely identical in form to almost every other IGA.
How do FATCA IGAs affect US citizens and green-card holders living outside the United States?
They affect US citizens (USCs) and lawful permanent residents (LPRs, green-card holders) in many ways. Foreign financial institutions around the world now collect extensive information to identify account holders who are “U.S. Persons” or “Specified U.S. Persons,” the term the IGAs use for accounts that must be reported. If you received questions from a foreign bank asking whether you are a US person, FATCA is why. The reporting reaches beyond direct accounts. It also reaches entities that a US person controls.
Why are some foreign banks refusing or closing accounts for US citizens and LPRs?
Many FFIs have adopted a policy to no longer accept or retain US accounts. The cost of complying with FATCA for US citizens and lawful permanent residents is high. Many FFIs also want to avoid the risk of being penalized heavily by the US federal government, including being charged with aiding and abetting US taxpayers to evade their US tax obligations. Jack Townsend’s website, Federal Tax Crimes, reviews these cases in detail, with particular focus on Swiss banks and the US DOJ Program for Swiss Banks.
What is the difference between a “U.S. Reportable Account” and a “Country X Reportable Account”?
This difference is the core asymmetry of FATCA. A “U.S. Reportable Account” is defined extraordinarily broadly. A “Country X Reportable Account,” for example a Colombian Reportable Account, is defined narrowly. That gap is why the IGAs are not truly bilateral: US banks do not have to provide the same detailed information on their non-US clients that FFIs must provide on US accounts. A plain reading of the IGAs gets you to that conclusion.
What income must a US bank report on a foreign resident’s account?
Only a limited slice. A Colombian Reportable Account obligates US banks to send information on US source income of individual residents under chapter 3, plus certain accounts of Colombian entities. All non-US source income of a Colombia resident individual is not subject to reporting by the US financial institution. A Colombian resident could hold a US$150M portfolio of non-US mutual funds and ADRs (American Depositary Receipts) traded on the NYSE, with none of that income reported to the Colombian government. Stock sales of US corporations such as Apple, Ford, or Microsoft are not treated as “US source income” under chapter 3 either.
Can a foreign resident use an offshore company to avoid US bank reporting?
Yes, under the IGAs as written. If a Colombian resident holds investments through an offshore corporation, for example a BVI (British Virgin Islands) company, no reporting is required of the US financial institution. That holds even if the entire US$150M portfolio is invested in US stocks, US treasuries, and other American financial investments. Individuals resident in countries such as the UK, France, Mexico, China, the Netherlands, Spain, Colombia, Brazil, Belgium, Guatemala, and Luxembourg can generally hold US investment assets through opaque legal structures and hide behind the entity. A US financial institution has no duty to identify or disclose the beneficial owners to those residents’ tax authorities.
What must a foreign bank report on an account controlled by a US person?
Far more. A “U.S. Reportable Account” includes a US Person who is a “Controlling Person” of a “Non-U.S. Entity.” Take the reverse example: a Colombian bank must identify all of its clients holding non-US entities, an expensive due diligence process, and then determine whether each entity such as a BVI company has a “Specified U.S. Person” behind it. It does not matter whether the income comes from Colombian sources or non-Colombian sources. Income is income, and the FFI must report it. Banks in at least 113 countries must drill down and collect detailed information on the beneficial owners of basically all companies, trusts, and other legal entities, to find “U.S. persons” and “substantial U.S. owners” as defined in the FATCA regulations.
Can US taxpayers hide assets behind offshore entities under FATCA?
Generally no. FFIs must provide extensive information on all income in a “U.S. Reportable Account” to the IRS, either directly or indirectly through their own governments. US taxpayers cannot hide behind offshore opaque legal entities. It is generally illegal for US citizens to form and hold assets in a foreign corporation without reporting that corporation’s assets, activities, and earnings. Such a foreign corporation would generally be a CFC (controlled foreign corporation) or possibly a PFIC (passive foreign investment company).
Read the full analysis here.
Who Was FATCA Actually Aimed At? The Law’s Origins and Unintended Consequences
Read the full analysis here.
What is FATCA, and when did it take effect?
FATCA (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) is a US law that went into effect on 1 January 2014. Since then, there have been an increasing number of consequences for United States citizens (USCs) and lawful permanent residents (LPRs, or green-card holders) who live overseas.
What was FATCA designed to do?
FATCA was built to bring transparency to the worldwide assets of US citizens and green-card holders. Its intended consequences include:
- Identifying non-US financial, investment, and company assets held by USCs and LPRs.
- Identifying the foreign financial institution (FFI) where those assets are located.
- Identifying non-financial foreign entities (NFFE) owned by a USC or LPR.
- Generally bringing transparency to the assets, accounts, and information about the worldwide assets of USCs and LPRs.
Much of this information gets collected through IRS forms, including Forms W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E, and W-9 used by USCs and LPRs overseas. To carry this out around the world, the US Treasury Department negotiated FATCA Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) with various countries.
Who was FATCA originally meant to target?
The group FATCA originally targeted was US resident individuals who were evading taxes through foreign financial institutions. The focus was on US resident taxpayers, even though the US imposes income tax on the worldwide income of US citizens living anywhere in the world. This understanding comes from extensive conversations with ex-government officials and some government officials who were involved in the original policy discussions.
What is the biggest unintended consequence of FATCA?
One of the most significant unintended consequences is that the US federal government, meaning the IRS, the Treasury Department, and Congress, never initially even contemplated USCs and LPRs living overseas. An unintended consequence is one that was never contemplated by Congress or the President when the laws were passed, nor intended by the Treasury Department as the IGAs were negotiated. The heavy compliance burden now felt by Americans and green-card holders abroad was a consequence of this kind, not part of the original plan.
Why has it been hard for the IRS to collect taxes from Americans living abroad?
For many years, the US federal government has known it can be nearly impossible to collect a tax liability against US citizens who live and hold their assets outside the United States. The Treasury Department made this point back in 1998, noting that because the United States asserts taxing jurisdiction over people with little or no connection to the country other than citizenship or status as a lawful permanent resident, overseas US taxpayers are in many cases difficult to trace or contact. Treasury added that even when valid tax assessments can be made against overseas taxpayers, the IRS has limited enforcement recourse if the taxpayer’s assets are physically located outside the United States. This appears on pages 13 to 15 of that 1998 Treasury report.
Did the early offshore disclosure programs account for people living overseas?
The original offshore voluntary disclosure initiative in 2009 never even contemplated any particular treatment for USCs or LPRs residing overseas. At that time, the US citizen or green-card holder living abroad was not on the IRS radar. The programs shifted over time:
- In 2011, a new category imposed a 5% penalty for persons residing overseas who had only US$10,000 of US-source income.
- As the IRS realized that millions of USCs and LPRs live somewhere other than the US, the 2014 OVDP was modified again to provide a 0% penalty in certain circumstances for these individuals.
FATCA itself was originally passed in 2010, and at that point USCs and LPRs living overseas were not the focus and barely a thought.
Are Americans living overseas now a focus of the government?
Yes. Even the Senate has started to focus on US citizens living overseas. The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations focused extensively on Swiss accounts opened by US citizens living outside the United States. Its findings appear in the report titled Offshore Tax Evasion: The Effort to Collect Unpaid Taxes on Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts, dated February 26, 2014.
Read the full analysis here.
Read the full analysis here.
Why Is My Foreign Bank Asking Me for a US Tax ID Number?
If you are a US citizen or green card holder living abroad, your local bank may have asked you to provide a US taxpayer identification number before opening an account. This is a consequence of FATCA, a US law that requires foreign banks to identify their American clients. Here is what is happening.
Table of contents:
What is FATCA and why does it affect my foreign bank?
Why does my foreign bank need my US tax ID number?
What if I have never had a Social Security Number?
What is FATCA and why does it affect my foreign bank?
FATCA, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, took effect in 2014. It requires foreign financial institutions worldwide to identify their US account holders. This obligation extends to financial institutions worldwide.
A “US account” includes an account held by a US citizen who has lived all or almost all of their life outside the United States. The US Treasury has summarized FATCA’s purpose as obtaining information on accounts held by US taxpayers in other countries, as well as accounts held by certain foreign entities with substantial US owners, needed to detect and deter offshore tax evasion.
To enforce this, US financial institutions are required to withhold a portion of certain payments made to foreign financial institutions that do not agree to identify and report information on US account holders. This withholding regime acts as a backstop to FATCA’s main focus. The details and complexity of FATCA are significant, involving hundreds of pages of regulations.
Why does my foreign bank need my US tax ID number?
When you open a new account, your foreign bank must determine whether you are a US person. If you are a US citizen or lawful permanent resident (green card holder), it must collect your US taxpayer identification number (TIN). Under US tax law, a US citizen has no choice but to obtain a Social Security Number (SSN) as their TIN. Your bank will ask you to provide it, typically through IRS Form W-9 or a substitute form provided by the bank.
What if I have never had a Social Security Number?
Here is the catch-22. A US citizen who has spent virtually all of their life outside the United States will typically have no SSN. This includes people who were born in the US but raised abroad, and those who acquired citizenship through a US citizen parent, known as derivative citizenship. The bank asks for a TIN, but you do not have one to give.
The same problem arises for lawful permanent residents (green card holders) who have lived outside the United States for most of their lives. An LPR who never worked or filed taxes in the US may have no SSN or ITIN on record, yet their foreign bank now demands one under FATCA. The process of obtaining an SSN or ITIN as someone living outside the United States is particularly complex and will be addressed in a separate post.
This post provides general information only and is not legal advice. Consult an experienced attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read the full analysis here.
Can a US Citizen Sign a W-8 Form Instead of a W-9?
When your foreign bank asks you to complete a W-9 form as a US person, you may wonder whether you can sign a W-8 form instead to avoid FATCA reporting. The short answer is no. For US citizens, signing a W-8 is not a legal alternative. Here is why.
Table of contents:
What forms do foreign banks collect from US persons?
Can a US citizen sign a W-8 form?
What about derivative citizenship?
What is the difference between physical residency and tax residency?
What are the legal consequences of signing the wrong form?
Foreign financial institutions worldwide are required under FATCA to collect an IRS Form W-9, or a substitute W-9 form, from their US account holders. These forms may be provided in the local language of the country where the bank operates. US citizens are US persons, and most LPRs are also US persons under this definition. The goal is to identify “US persons” under US federal tax law.
Can a US citizen sign a W-8 form?
No. Under US tax law (26 USC § 6109), the only taxpayer identification number an individual US citizen may use is their Social Security Number. A US citizen, even one who has never lived a day in the United States, cannot legally sign an IRS Form W-8 certifying they are not a US person. Doing so would be signing a false document.
What about derivative citizenship?
Some people are US citizens without realizing it, through a process called derivative citizenship. A person born outside the United States to a parent who was a US citizen may have automatically acquired US citizenship at birth. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) provides a Nationality Chart 1 for children born outside the United States to help determine whether citizenship was acquired at birth through a US citizen parent. If you have derivative US citizenship, you are a US person and you cannot sign a W-8.
What is the difference between physical residency and tax residency?
There are two different concepts of residency. Physical residence refers to where a person actually lives. Tax residence, for US federal tax purposes, is determined by citizenship or LPR status, not by where you live. A US citizen who has not lived in the United States for many years is nevertheless treated as a US income tax resident, meaning a “US person,” for FATCA and tax purposes.
What are the legal consequences of signing the wrong form?
Any US individual income tax resident who intentionally signs a false IRS Form W-8 is filing a false document, which falls under the purview of IRC Section 7206(1), the federal perjury statute.
This post provides general information only and is not legal advice. Consult an experienced attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read the full analysis here.
Understanding Your FBAR Obligations: A Guide for U.S. Citizens and Residents Abroad
If you are a U.S. citizen or a Green Card holder living overseas, you may have heard of the “FBAR.” While it sounds like a complex tax term, it is actually a financial reporting requirement that follows you no matter where you live in the world.
Here is a breakdown of what you need to know to stay compliant, explained in plain English but with a focus on the legal details.
Table of contents:
What is the FBAR?
Who has to file?
What accounts are covered?
Is the FBAR the same as Form 8938?
The reality of FBAR penalties
How to file
What is the FBAR?
The FBAR stands for the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts. Its official name is FinCEN Form 114.
Legally, this is not an income tax requirement. It is a mandatory report required under Title 31, Section 5314 of the U.S. Code. Because it falls under “Money and Finance” laws rather than the Internal Revenue Code, you do not file it with the IRS. Instead, you file it with FinCEN (the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network), a separate branch of the Treasury Department.
Who has to file?
The requirement applies to all U.S. Citizens (USCs) and Lawful Permanent Residents (LPRs), regardless of their physical location.
Global Reach: If you are a U.S. citizen living in France, you are required to report your French bank accounts, as well as any other accounts you might hold in places like London or Geneva.
Green Card Holders: Similarly, a Green Card holder living in Sao Paulo, Brazil, must report their Brazilian accounts and any accounts held in other countries, such as Uruguay.
Defining “Resident”: Interestingly, the law for FBARs uses the tax code’s definition (Internal Revenue Code Section 7701(b)) to determine who counts as a “resident,” even though the FBAR itself is not a tax form.
Note: While many resources mention a $10,000 threshold for filing, this specific dollar amount is not mentioned in the legal excerpts provided here; you should verify current filing thresholds independently.
What accounts are covered?
The law is broad and covers bank and financial accounts located outside of the United States. This includes accounts in your country of residence and any other foreign country. Currently, all FBARs must be submitted using the electronic Form 114, which replaced the old paper form known as TD F 90-22.1.
No, though they are often confused because they involve duplicate reporting.
FBAR (Form 114): A financial report filed with FinCEN under Title 31.
Form 8938: A tax information return filed directly with your IRS tax return under Title 26.
A major legal distinction lies in the statute of limitations. The FBAR has a time limit after which the government can no longer assess penalties, even if you never filed the form. In contrast, if you fail to file Form 8938, there is no time limit for the IRS to come back and assess income taxes and penalties for that year.
The reality of FBAR penalties
The penalties for failing to file an FBAR are often discussed as being severe, but the law provides some unique protections.
Penalties are Elective: The law states the Secretary of the Treasury “may” (not “shall”) impose a penalty. This means the government has the discretion to decide whether or not to penalize a violation; it is not mandatory.
Limited Collection Powers: Unlike a standard tax debt, the government cannot simply place a tax lien or levy on your property to collect an FBAR penalty. Instead, the government typically must sue you in a judicial court action to enforce the penalty.
Expiration Dates: Because there is a statute of limitations, the government’s window to act is limited. For example, if a U.S. citizen missed a filing for the year 2006, the time for the government to assess a penalty has already lapsed.
How to file
Gone are the days of mailing paper forms. All FBARs must now be filed electronically through the BSA E-Filing System website.
Staying compliant is obligatory, but understanding these nuances can help you navigate the process with more confidence. If you have accounts abroad, ensuring your electronic Form 114 is submitted correctly is the best way to avoid the complications of a potential government investigation.
This post provides general information only and is not legal advice. Consult an experienced attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read the full analysis here.
