Month: February 2014
What are the consequences of becoming a “covered expatriate” for failing to comply with Section 877(a)(2)(C)?
Many lay persons are stumped as they try to understand the tax consequences of Sections 877 and 877A. The language in the drafting of the statutes is not so clear. Be careful to understate the meaning and how the IRS interprets the law.
One of the greatest risks for anyone who wants to self-diagnose their path towards becoming a former U.S. citizen, is Section 877(a)(2)(C). To be blunt, anyone who renounces their citizenship at the Embassy or Consulate will find that process relatively easy. However, no one at the U.S. Department of State will provide tax advice or try to interpret the meaning of Section 877(a)(2)(C). Indeed, the Foreign Affairs Manual used to read to the person taking the oath, simply provides the standard overview language of “special tax consequences” arising form the renunciation.
Even the most economically modest individual, with little assets or income, can fall into this trap for the unwary – Section 877(a)(2)(C). The statute is spelled out below –
- This section shall apply to any individual if—
- (A) the average annual net income tax . . . is greater than $124,000,
- (B) the net worth of the individual as of such date is $2,000,000 or more, or
- (C) such individual fails to certify under penalty of perjury that he has met the requirements of this title for the 5 preceding taxable years or fails to submit such evidence of such compliance as the Secretary may require.
Will the IRS and G20 Countries Disagree with the WSJ Opinion Piece of Last Year-
OPINION EUROPE
How to Lose Friends, Citizens and Influence
The U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act seeks to co-opt foreign banks as long-arm enforcement agencies of the IRS.
This thoughtful article (found here) from an academic that previously appeared in the Wall Street Journal, is worth re-thinking in light of the OECD and G20 Action Plan – Base Erosion Plan.
Hearings – Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations – re: Offshore Tax Evasion: The Effort to Collect Unpaid Taxes on Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts – February 26, 2014
The video recording of the February 26th hearings can be viewed here.
The complete report can be reviewed here – REPORT: Offshore Tax Evasion:The Effort to Collect Unpaid Taxes on Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts (February 26, 2014)
请点击这里查看本帖子的中文版本。 (Please click here to view the above in Chinese.)
This is a good article on NPR – Why More Americans Are Renouncing U.S. Citizenship
This is put both in the Media section and elevated to a specific post – as it is a thoughtful article.
Will the IRS be assisting the Justice Department to prosecute U.S. citizens who have lived abroad most (if not all) of their lives?
Will the IRS be assisting the Justice Department to prosecute U.S. citizens who have lived abroad most (if not all) of their lives?
**
The on-going focus of of the government, including the purported “Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts” by the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, begs the questions, where are these billions of assets by U.S. taxpayers?
**
Will this be the premiss used by the IRS and Justice Department to try to prosecute U.S. citizens residing overseas?
Law abiding U.S. citizens who have spent most (if not all) of their lives overseas are put in an untenable position vis–à–vis the U.S. federal government regarding U.S. tax and tax filing obligations.
**
See what the government has to say
**
Offshore Tax Evasion: The Effort to Collect Unpaid Taxes on Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts
The Treasury Inspector General wrote the following in a 2009 report (of which none of these numbers have seriously been questioned, supported or analyzed) – – titled
Synopsis
The IRS estimated that the entire tax gap for Tax Year 2001 was $345 billion. However, the IRS has not developed an estimate for the international tax gap. Non-IRS estimates of the international tax gap range from $40 billion to $123 billion. While there might be overlap between the IRS tax gap estimate and the international tax gap, it is doubtful that the $345 billion estimate includes the entire international tax gap.
The primary reason for this conclusion is that identifying hidden income within international activity is very difficult and time–consuming.[4] Furthermore, the IRS did not measure for the international tax gap component in the Individual National Research Project (NRP) estimate for the Tax Year 2001 tax gap. Therefore, it is unlikely that hidden offshore income is comprehensively included in the IRS tax gap estimates. In fact, the IRS’s Research, Analysis and Statistics (RAS) organization reasoned that because of cost, staffing, and technical limitations, an NRP type of direct measurement is unfeasible. However, in an attempt to learn more, the IRS has other initiatives underway.
请点击这里查看本帖子的中文版本。 (Please click here to view the above in Chinese.)
How does the basic premiss that there are ‘Unpaid Taxes on Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts'” hurt the average U.S. citizen taxpayer living overseas?
Offshore Tax Evasion: The Effort to Collect Unpaid Taxes on Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations
Location: Dirksen Senate Office Building
Agenda
The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will hold a hearing, “Offshore Tax Evasion: The Effort to Collect Unpaid Taxes on Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts,” on Wednesday, February 26, 2014, at 9:30 a.m., in Room G-50 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
The hearing will continue the Subcommittee’s examination of tax haven bank facilitation of U.S. tax evasion, focusing on the status of efforts to hold Swiss banks and their U.S. clients accountable for unpaid taxes on billions of dollars in hidden assets. Witnesses will include representatives from a Swiss bank and the U.S. Department of Justice. A witness list will be available Monday, February 24, 2014.
Do some former U.S. citizens now consider this a “badge of honor” to have renounced their U.S. citizenship?
A record number of U.S. citizenship renunciations in 2013, some 3,000, begs the question: “Why are so many U.S. citizens renouncing?”
请点击这里查看本帖子的中文版本。 (Please click here to view the above in Chinese.)
Wow, the number of 2,999 U.S. citizens who renounced in the year 2013 shattered the prior record set in 2011 of 1,782 renunciations. Why so many renunciations?
The U.S. Treasury Department released the number of U.S. citizens who renounced for 2013. The Federal Registry reported some 631 U.S. citizens who renounced for the quarter; for a total of 2,999 former citizens for the entire year of 2013.
Click here for complete details of the registry
See also more information in this blog under the “Government Resources” section for more details.
请点击这里查看本帖子的中文版本。 (Please click here to view the above in Chinese.)
Does former IRS official have it right when he says ““The new whistle-blower provisions Congress enacted a couple of years ago have the potential to be a real disaster for the tax system,” he said in the interview. “I believe that it is unseemly in this country to encourage people to turn in their neighbors and employers to the I.R.S., as contemplated by this particular program. The I.R.S. didn’t ask for these rules; they were forced on it by the Congress.”
By GRETCHEN MORGENSONFEB. 8, 2014
请点击这里查看本帖子的中文版本。 (Please click here to view the above in Chinese.)
Should the IRS modify its offshore voluntary disclosure program for U.S. citizens residing overseas? IRS is reconsidering the effectiveness of its offshore voluntary disclosure program. Should it be modified?
Should the IRS modify its offshore voluntary disclosure program for U.S. citizens residing overseas? IRS is reconsidering the effectiveness of its offshore voluntary disclosure program. Should it be modified?
According to Tax Analyst’s “The IRS is reexamining its offshore voluntary disclosure program and considering making modifications to it, according to Michael Danilack, deputy commissioner (international), IRS Large Business and International Division.”
U.S. citizens who have lived most all of their lives overseas should not be subject to the same scrutiny and inflexibility that currently exists for U.S. taxpayers residing in the U.S. Important differences exist, mostly because of the lack of U.S. citizens residing overseas to understand the complex U.S. tax law system applicable to them; in addition to the country’s tax laws and requirements in their country of residence.
The de-facto U.S. income tax residency regime is a residence based regime for several reasons. First, the National Taxpayer Advocate estimates there are between 5-7 million U.S. citizens residing overseas. Second, only a small portion of these taxpayers apparently even file U.S. income tax returns. The IRS taxpayer statistics office showed that only 334,851 U.S. taxpayers filed a foreign earned income exclusions (for the year 2006, which is the latest year available from the IRS office of tax statistics). How many of these taxpayers are not even U.S. citizens? The details of U.S. tax returns filed with foreign earned income exclusions can be read here.
Each country’s filings are set out below (notice only 6,112 returns were filed from Mexico, where the largest number of U.S. citizens reside in any particular country; with Canada as the second most populated with U.S. citizens):
All geographic areas | 334,851 |
North America, total | 36,179 |
Canada | 30,067 |
Greenland | 0 |
Mexico | 6,112 |
Latin/South America, total | 13,911 |
Argentina | 751 |
Brazil | 2,696 |
Chile | 902 |
Colombia | 1,870 |
Costa Rica | 1,662 |
Panama | 1,032 |
Peru | 419 |
Venezuela | 705 |
Other Latin and South American countries | 3,876 |
Caribbean, total | 7,323 |
Bahamas | 1,089 |
Bermuda | 1,758 |
Cayman Islands | 970 |
Dominican Republic | 1,093 |
Other Caribbean countries | 2,414 |
Europe, total | 99,732 |
Austria | 1,361 |
Belgium | 1,881 |
Czech Republic | 1,091 |
Denmark | 1,754 |
Finland | 354 |
France | 9,653 |
Germany | 21,513 |
Greece | 1,484 |
Hungary | 604 |
Ireland | 1,896 |
Italy | 5,199 |
Luxembourg | 219 |
Netherlands | 3,263 |
Norway | 1,215 |
Poland | 735 |
Portugal | 387 |
Russia | 2,495 |
Spain | 2,453 |
Sweden | 1,399 |
Switzerland | 7,093 |
Turkey | 1,199 |
United Kingdom | 28,409 |
Other European countries | 4,078 |
Africa, total | 9,697 |
Algeria | * 241 |
Angola | 398 |
Egypt | 1,658 |
Kenya | 992 |
Nigeria | 906 |
South Africa | 923 |
Other African countries | 4,576 |
Asia, total | 138,795 |
Afghanistan | 5,912 |
China | 12,430 |
Hong Kong | 10,792 |
India | 4,214 |
Indonesia | 1,786 |
Iraq | 18,325 |
Israel | 8,986 |
Japan | 23,529 |
Malaysia | 1,160 |
Philippines | 2,313 |
Saudi Arabia | 5,109 |
Singapore | 3,636 |
South Korea | 6,668 |
Taiwan | 6,588 |
Thailand | 3,643 |
United Arab Emirates | 7,423 |
Other Asian countries | 16,284 |
Oceania, total | 9,724 |
Australia | 6,420 |
New Zealand | 2,518 |
Other Oceania countries | 787 |
All other countries | 19,490 |
请点击这里查看本帖子的中文版本。 (Please click here to view the above in Chinese.)