Is there a legal difference between “relinquishing” and “renouncing” U.S. citizenship for tax purposes?
For U.S. federal tax purposes, “relinquish” and “renounce” are in effect interchangeable. Many people assume the two words carry an important legal distinction. For federal tax purposes, they generally do not. This question was first taken up in an earlier post dated June 21, 2014. The expatriation tax statute, IRC Sections 877 and 877A (the U.S. tax rules that apply when a person gives up U.S. citizenship), uses both terms in the same breath. What drives the tax result is not which word applies but the “expatriation date.”
What date actually matters under the U.S. expatriation tax rules?
The key time reference is the “expatriation date.” Under IRC Sections 877 and 877A (the U.S. expatriation tax rules), this date is defined in Section 877A(g)(3). It focuses on specific dates tied to meetings or events with the U.S. Department of State. Because the tax outcome turns on this date, the choice between the words “relinquish” and “renounce” does not, by itself, change it.
Why don’t the words “relinquish” and “renounce” change the tax outcome?
Both words point to the same thing under the tax law. The expatriation tax statute, IRC Sections 877 and 877A, uses “renounce” and “relinquish” in the same breath. The result instead depends on the “expatriation date” defined in Section 877A(g)(3), which is tied to specific meetings or events with the U.S. Department of State. So the terminology a person uses does not, on its own, change the federal tax treatment.
Consult an experienced attorney about how these rules apply to a specific situation.
How does your immigration status decide whether you owe U.S. tax?
Your U.S. tax status starts with your immigration status. The U.S. taxes a “U.S. person” (the technical term used for U.S. federal tax purposes) on worldwide income, and whether you are a “U.S. person” depends largely on immigration concepts. Three immigration-based categories can make someone a U.S. person:
U.S. citizenship;
lawful permanent residency (a green card); and
meeting the substantial presence test as a non-citizen.
A person in any of these categories may have U.S. income tax residency, and so may be subject to U.S. income tax on income earned anywhere in the world.
Who counts as a U.S. citizen for tax purposes?
Almost every individual born in the United States is a U.S. citizen under the 14th Amendment. Citizenship can also pass from a parent. A child born outside the U.S. to a U.S. citizen parent may also be a U.S. citizen at birth through “derivative citizenship,” meaning citizenship derived from a U.S. citizen parent. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) publishes “Nationality Chart 1, for Children Born Outside U.S.” to help determine whether such a child was a U.S. citizen at birth. Because U.S. citizens are “U.S. persons,” they are generally subject to U.S. tax on their worldwide income.
Can a green-card holder or visa holder be a “U.S. person” too?
Yes. Two non-citizen categories can still make someone a “U.S. person” for tax. The first is a lawful permanent resident (LPR), a green-card holder; LPR status carries a series of complex rules that can affect “U.S. person” status. The second is a person who is neither a citizen nor an LPR but who meets the “substantial presence test,” a tax test based on the number of days an individual is physically present in the United States. A person in either category may be treated as a “U.S. person” and taxed on worldwide income.
What is FATCA, and why is your foreign bank asking if you are a U.S. person?
If your foreign bank has asked whether you are a U.S. person, FATCA is why. FATCA (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, Chapter 4 of Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code) entered into force in January 2014. It imposes obligations on financial institutions (“FFI”) and basically all private companies and legal entities (“NFFE”) throughout the world to confirm whether they have any “U.S. person” account holders or owners. That worldwide duty to check is what leads banks and companies outside the U.S. to ask account holders about their U.S. status.
How does a former U.S. citizen prove they are no longer a “U.S. person”?
A former U.S. citizen must generally provide a Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN), Form DS-4083, to prove they are no longer a U.S. person. This is a specific requirement both under the FATCA regulations and under a provision adopted into the FATCA intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) signed between the U.S. and other countries. For example, Annex I of the IGA between the U.S. and Spain addresses CLNs. Without the CLN, a financial institution may continue to treat the individual as a U.S. person.
Why does a U.S. place of birth make foreign banks ask for extra proof?
A U.S. place of birth is a warning sign to a withholding agent. Under Treasury Regulations Section 1.1441–7T, a withholding agent has reason to know that documents claiming foreign status are unreliable if its records show an unambiguous U.S. place of birth. To still treat such an account holder as a foreign person, the agent generally needs documentary evidence of citizenship in a country other than the United States (described in § 1.1471–3(c)(5)(i)(B)), plus one of the following:
a copy of the individual’s Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN); or
a reasonable written explanation of the renunciation of U.S. citizenship, or of why the person did not obtain U.S. citizenship at birth.
Alternatively, a valid Form W–8 establishing the account holder’s foreign status, together with that citizenship evidence and the written explanation, may satisfy the requirement.
Once you are no longer a U.S. person, does FATCA reporting stop?
Generally yes, once the right documentation is on file. A person who is no longer a “U.S. person” can generally avoid FATCA reporting to the IRS by a foreign financial institution (FFI), or by a company or legal entity (NFFE) in any country outside the U.S. The condition is that the supporting documentation, namely the Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN), is provided to that institution or entity. Until the CLN reaches the institution, FATCA reporting on the account may continue.
What is an Apostille Certificate, and why pair it with a CLN?
An Apostille Certificate is an international authentication confirming that an official document is genuine for use in another country. When providing a Certificate of Loss of Nationality (CLN) to a foreign financial institution or company, it is often advisable to obtain an Apostille Certificate along with the CLN. Some third-party organizations will accept the CLN only when it carries this certification. Pairing the apostille with the CLN can help the document be accepted abroad.
Future posts will cover more on the interplay of FATCA and former U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents.
Does “covered expatriate” status only matter for wealthy people?
No. It is easy to assume the US expatriation tax rules only reach the rich, the wealthy, and the private-jet set. The press usually features wealthy renouncers like Tina Turner and Eduardo Saverin, the co-founder of Facebook, which fuels that assumption. But wealth is not the trigger. The rules can reach the poorest former US citizen, and certain long-term green card holders, wherever they live, if they fail the certification requirement in IRC Section 877(a)(2)(C).
What are the net worth and income tax tests people usually focus on?
Most coverage of expatriation focuses on two dollar thresholds. The first is the net worth test of US$2 million. The second is the income tax liability test of roughly US$125,000 of average annual net income tax. A “covered expatriate” is a former US citizen, or long-term green card holder, who on giving up that status either crosses one of those dollar thresholds or fails to certify tax compliance under Section 877(a)(2)(C). Because the headlines fixate on the dollar tests, the certification path is the one people miss.
Can you be a covered expatriate if you have no assets?
Yes. The certification requirement under Section 877(a)(2)(C) applies regardless of wealth. A former US citizen, or certain long-term green card holder, who cannot certify compliance becomes a “covered expatriate” even with almost nothing to their name. This is why the rules can reach so-called Accidental Americans who have spent little or no time in the US. The dollar thresholds are only one way in; failing to certify is another.
Does US expatriation tax apply to green card holders too?
Yes. The expatriation tax rules reach certain long-term lawful permanent residents (green card holders), not only US citizens. When a long-term LPR relinquishes or abandons their green card, the same certification requirement under Section 877(a)(2)(C) applies. A long-term LPR who cannot certify compliance becomes a covered expatriate on the same terms as a citizen who renounces.
If you have no assets, do you owe US income tax when you expatriate?
No. The expatriation income tax runs through a “mark-to-market” regime, which taxes unrealized gains as if you sold everything the day before you leave. With no assets, there are no unrealized gains, no tax base, and so no exit income tax. Even cash produces none. US dollars carry a tax basis equal to their face amount, so there is no unrealized gain on cash to tax.
What are the two points where expatriation can trigger US tax?
There are two. The first is the moment a US citizen or green card holder expatriates, that is, leaves the US tax system. This is the exit tax on unrealized gains, and it produces nothing for a person with no unrealized gains. The second arrives later, when a US person receives a covered gift or bequest from the covered expatriate under IRC Section 2801. That second point can land decades after the expatriation event.
What is the Section 2801 tax on covered gifts and bequests?
IRC Section 2801, enacted in 2008, taxes the US person who receives a gift or bequest from a covered expatriate. The recipient pays effectively 40% of the fair market value of the property received. There are virtually no deductions or exemptions, so the 40% applies to the full value. The gift or bequest can be direct or indirect, for example through a trust. Treasury has a proposed-regulation project underway under Section 2801.
Can someone with significant assets still owe no exit income tax?
Yes. Unrealized gains, not wealth, drive the exit income tax. Compare USC “A” with US$5,000 in total assets and USC “B” with US$15 million of cash in the bank and nothing else. Both owe the same exit income tax: US$0. Cash carries a tax basis equal to its amount, so neither has any unrealized gain to tax. And if neither can satisfy the certification requirement under Section 877(a)(2)(C), both are covered expatriates just the same.
Why would a covered expatriate with no assets ever create a future tax bill?
Because the Section 2801 tax can land long after expatriation, on assets you do not have yet. Two things change over time. You may grow or inherit assets after expatriating, while no longer a US citizen, ending up with far more than you hold today. And people in your life, family or friends, may become US residents even if none are today. Either shift can set up a future covered gift or bequest from you to a US person.
How much tax could a modest future inheritance trigger?
Take USC “A,” who renounces and, 40 years later, leaves a US$120,000 bequest to a daughter who has since moved to the US. Under Section 2801, the daughter would owe more than US$40,000 in tax on that inheritance, roughly 40%, with virtually no deductions or exemptions. That is a heavy burden on a relatively modest inheritance. It is one of several scenarios that show how covered expatriate status can matter over the long run.
How realistic is it that a future heir becomes a US person?
It is common. One family member moves to the US temporarily for work or graduate school, gets married, and decides to stay, even for a while. Often they have children, who are US citizens by birth in the US. A US person is now part of the family tree. A future gift or bequest from a covered expatriate to that person can fall under Section 2801, decades after the expatriation itself.
How much does it cost to renounce U.S. citizenship?
The fee to process a Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship rose to US$2,350, up from US$450. That is an increase of more than 500%. The U.S. Department of State announced the change, and it applies to the consular service of accepting and adjudicating a renunciation.
Why did the State Department raise the renunciation fee so much?
The Department said the new fee reflects the true cost of providing the service. Documenting a renunciation is described as extremely costly, because U.S. consular officers overseas spend substantial time to accept, process, and adjudicate each case. The fee had previously been subsidized, and the Department said it seeks to recover the cost of consular services through the fees it collects. It reviews these costs regularly and adjusts fees to match the cost of service.
When did the higher renunciation fee take effect?
The new fee took effect on September 12, 2014. The Department announced the change from Mexico City on August 28, 2014, as part of a broader adjustment to processing fees for several consular services.
How long can it take to get an appointment to renounce?
At some consulate offices around the world, appointments for renunciations were reportedly not available until the year 2015. A person seeking to renounce may face a long wait, because demand for these appointments can exceed what a given consulate can schedule in the near term.
What other consular fees changed at the same time?
Most nonimmigrant visa processing fees stayed the same, but several other fees moved alongside the renunciation fee:
The fee for E visas (treaty-traders and treaty-investors) decreased.
The fee for K visas (for fiancé(e)s of U.S. citizens) increased.
The fee for Border Crossing Cards for Mexican citizen minor applicants under age 15 increased by $1.
For immigrant visas, the fee for family-sponsored immigrant visas increased, as did the fee for domestic review of an Affidavit of Support.
All other immigrant and special visa processing fees that changed decreased.
Where were the new fees published, and could the public comment?
The proposed fees were published in the Federal Register and took effect 15 days later. The change was issued as an interim final rule, viewable at http://www.regulations.gov. Comments were accepted until 60 days after publication, and the Department said it would consider the public comments and address them in the published final rule. Fee information may also be found on the Bureau of Consular Affairs website, travel.state.gov, and on the websites of U.S. embassies and consulates.
The Social Security Act regulations set specific rules for Social Security numbers (SSNs) at § 422.103, titled “Social security numbers.” These rules cover how a person applies for an SSN, how to obtain a replacement Social Security card, how SSNs are assigned, and how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can have an agreement with the Social Security Administration (SSA) on issuing SSNs to people who have immigrated to the United States.
Who is eligible for a Social Security number?
Form SS-5 explains the general requirements for an SSN as set forth in the law. To qualify for an SSN and a card, an individual must be one of the following:
a U.S. citizen,
a person with lawful, work-authorized immigration status, or
a person with a valid non-work reason for requesting an SSN and a card.
How do you apply for a Social Security number?
Applications for an SSN are completed on Form SS-5, which is located on the SSA’s website. Form SS-5 sets out the general requirements for an SSN as established in the law, including that the applicant be a U.S. citizen, have lawful work-authorized immigration status, or have a valid non-work reason for requesting a number and card.
How do immigrants get a Social Security number through the immigration process?
Under § 422.103(b)(3), the “Immigration form” rule, SSA may enter into an agreement with the Department of State (DOS) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to collect enumeration data as part of the immigration process. Where such an agreement is in effect, an alien need not complete a Form SS-5 with SSA. Instead, the person may request, through DOS or DHS as part of the immigration process, that SSA assign a Social Security number and issue a card. These requests are made on forms provided by DOS and DHS.
How many replacement Social Security cards can a person get?
The regulations limit how many replacement Social Security cards a person may receive. An individual may obtain a maximum of 10 replacement cards over a lifetime.
Can you cancel or expunge your Social Security number after losing US citizenship or green card status?
There appears to be no statutory or regulatory rule in the law that allows an individual to “expunge” or otherwise terminate a Social Security number once it has been obtained. This appears to remain the case even after a person loses U.S. citizen (USC) or lawful permanent resident (LPR, or green card) status. The assigned number generally stays in place. Anyone weighing the tax or immigration consequences of giving up citizenship or a green card may want to consult an experienced attorney.
Can a US Citizen Sign a W-8 Form Instead of a W-9?
When your foreign bank asks you to complete a W-9 form as a US person, you may wonder whether you can sign a W-8 form instead to avoid FATCA reporting. The short answer is no. For US citizens, signing a W-8 is not a legal alternative. Here is why.
What forms do foreign banks collect from US persons?
Foreign financial institutions worldwide are required under FATCA to collect an IRS Form W-9, or a substitute W-9 form, from their US account holders. These forms may be provided in the local language of the country where the bank operates. US citizens are US persons, and most LPRs are also US persons under this definition. The goal is to identify “US persons” under US federal tax law.
Can a US citizen sign a W-8 form?
No. Under US tax law (26 USC § 6109), the only taxpayer identification number an individual US citizen may use is their Social Security Number. A US citizen, even one who has never lived a day in the United States, cannot legally sign an IRS Form W-8 certifying they are not a US person. Doing so would be signing a false document.
What about derivative citizenship?
Some people are US citizens without realizing it, through a process called derivative citizenship. A person born outside the United States to a parent who was a US citizen may have automatically acquired US citizenship at birth. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) provides a Nationality Chart 1 for children born outside the United States to help determine whether citizenship was acquired at birth through a US citizen parent. If you have derivative US citizenship, you are a US person and you cannot sign a W-8.
What is the difference between physical residency and tax residency?
There are two different concepts of residency. Physical residence refers to where a person actually lives. Tax residence, for US federal tax purposes, is determined by citizenship or LPR status, not by where you live. A US citizen who has not lived in the United States for many years is nevertheless treated as a US income tax resident, meaning a “US person,” for FATCA and tax purposes.
What are the legal consequences of signing the wrong form?
Any US individual income tax resident who intentionally signs a false IRS Form W-8 is filing a false document, which falls under the purview of IRC Section 7206(1), the federal perjury statute.
This post provides general information only and is not legal advice. Consult an experienced attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Why You Need to Plan Before Renouncing US Citizenship
Giving up U.S. citizenship or a green card can trigger an immediate income tax bill, and the IRS may be able to collect it indefinitely, no matter where you live. The rules can also reach your friends and family. This post explains why tax planning generally comes before the paperwork, who the expatriation rules can affect, what the U.S. Department of State forms are, and how hard the tax may be to collect once you live abroad. Consulting an experienced attorney before taking any of these steps is essential.
Why does tax planning usually come before giving up U.S. citizenship or a green card?
U.S. international tax law is complex. Without planning, people can create very adverse tax consequences for themselves and for their friends and family, often without understanding the full implications of the law. This is especially true for tax expatriation, which is when a U.S. citizen (USC) renounces citizenship or a long-term lawful permanent resident (LPR), meaning a green card holder, abandons that status. Several features of the law make planning ahead important.
What is the general income tax rule when someone expatriates?
The general rule is that an immediate income tax is payable under the “mark to market” taxation rules on unrealized gains. Mark to market means that unrealized gains, the increase in value of assets that have not actually been sold, are treated as if the assets were sold and are taxed right away. This can produce an income tax bill at the time of expatriation, even though nothing has actually been sold.
Can the IRS collect the expatriation tax from someone living outside the United States?
Yes. Once a tax is recognized under U.S. tax law, the only way to discharge the liability with the U.S. federal government is to pay the tax owing. The IRS generally can collect an income tax owing against a taxpayer who lives outside the U.S. indefinitely. The normal 10 year collection statute does not apply while the individual is outside the United States for a continuous period of at least six months, under IRC Section 6503(c). In effect, the IRS can “forever” pursue collection of the expatriation tax against U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents living outside the U.S.
Can someone become a covered expatriate even with no assets?
Yes. It is easy to fall into the general rule of expatriation, even for a taxpayer who would not otherwise be subject to income taxation. A person who falls into these rules is called a “covered expatriate.” Because covered expatriate status can attach even to someone with no assets, it is sometimes described as a “Forever Taint.”
Can your friends and family be taxed because of your expatriation?
Yes. The friends and family of a covered expatriate, meaning a former U.S. citizen or long-term lawful permanent resident who fell into these rules, can be subject to U.S. taxation during their lifetimes, even if they also live outside the United States. This consequence comes from Section 2801, sometimes called the “Hidden Tax” of expatriation and another part of its “Forever Taint.”
What forms are filed to renounce U.S. citizenship?
Renouncing U.S. citizenship involves going to the U.S. Department of State and taking the oath of renunciation. Two forms are completed and filed at that time:
Form DS-4080, Oath of Renunciation of the Nationality of the United States.
Form DS-4081, Statement of Understanding Concerning the Consequences and Ramifications of Relinquishment or Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship.
The reason planning generally comes first is that these are the steps that formally complete the renunciation, after the tax consequences are already in motion.
If you live abroad with no U.S. assets, can the IRS still collect?
It may be difficult. If the individual lives outside the U.S., does not travel to and from the U.S., and has no assets in the U.S., it may be practically very difficult for the IRS to collect on the tax judgment owing. Even so, there are legal means and steps the IRS can take in an attempt to collect U.S. taxes on assets held overseas.
Why is planning important before renouncing citizenship or abandoning a green card?
Ideally, a former U.S. citizen or long-term lawful permanent resident will want to avoid these potential tax and collection issues by engaging in thoughtful and strategic planning before renouncing U.S. citizenship or abandoning lawful permanent residency. Because expatriation can trigger an immediate tax, long-term collection exposure, and tax consequences for family members, the planning generally comes before the renunciation paperwork. Consulting an experienced attorney before taking any of these steps is essential.
Not everyone who renounces US citizenship faces the same tax consequences. People who qualify as “covered expatriates” face significant additional obligations. Here is what that means and how even modest individuals can end up in this category.
One of the greatest risks for anyone who wants to give up US citizenship is Section 877(a)(2)(C). Even the most economically modest individual, with little assets or income, can fall into this trap. No one at the US Department of State will provide tax advice or interpret Section 877(a)(2)(C) for you. The renunciation appointment itself is straightforward. The tax consequences are not.
What are the three tests for covered expatriate status?
Under Section 877(a)(2), you are a covered expatriate if any one of the following is true:
(A) Your average annual net income tax liability is greater than $124,000;
(B) Your net worth is $2,000,000 or more as of your expatriation date; or
(C) You fail to certify under penalty of perjury that you have met all US tax requirements for the 5 preceding taxable years, or fail to submit the required evidence of compliance.
Any individual who meets any one of these tests will be a covered expatriate and subject to the taxation and reporting requirements under Sections 877, 877A, and 2801.
What happens at the embassy or consulate?
When you take the renunciation oath at a US embassy or consulate, the Foreign Affairs Manual provides only standard overview language about “special tax consequences.” The consular officer will not explain the specific rules of Section 877(a)(2)(C) or tell you whether you will be a covered expatriate. This is worth understanding well before going to take the oath.
This post provides general information only and is not legal advice. Consult an experienced attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Burdens of U.S. International Tax Compliance: Why some USCs residing overseas ultimately renounce U.S. citizenship (dizzying tax compliance)
The value of a U.S. citizenship is known throughout the world. Immigrating to the U.S. is something that is valued by millions of individuals around the world. The following table from State Department data explains the principle reasons people chose to immigrate to the U.S. – to come to the U.S.:
The year before last, 2023, nearly 900,000 individuals became naturalized citizens. Many of these individuals who immigrate become naturalized citizens or lawful permanent residents (LPRs) ultimately leave the U.S.
See, the National Taxpayer Advocate blog report –
Filing and Paying Taxes for U.S. Citizens or Residents Living Abroad
Does TIGTA have the Answer: to the Question – How many former U.S. citizens and long-term lawful permanent residents have filed and should have filed IRS Form 8854?
The short answer to the question above – is NO!
The government does not know how many IRS Forms 8854 should have been filed.
Note the total numbers of 8854 returns filed as reported in Figure 2 of the TIGTA Report were less than 25,000 during a ten year period. This report focuses really only on former U.S. citizens (“USC”) who have renounced their citizenship. Not on lawful permanent residents (“LPRs), which during that same ten year period there were around 200,000 who filed USCIS Form I-407.
* How Many Individuals Should have Filed Form 8854?
